Eco-Innovation on the Cost of Equity and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v16i1.66915Keywords:
Eco-innovation, Ownership structure, Cost of equity, Financial performanceAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of eco-innovation on the
cost of equity and financial performance moderated by ownership
structure. This study uses quantitative methods, and data is
analyzed using panel data analysis with Eviews. Samples obtained
were 237 companies from companies listed on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange period 2017-2020. The results show eco-innovation
does not affect the cost of equity because the issue of eco
innovation has not become a crucial issue in public; eco
innovation hurts financial performance because of significant
expenses for implementation. Ownership structure does not
affect eco-innovation, meaning shareholders cannot intervene in
the implementation of eco-innovation. Ownership structure
(managerial, family, institutional, foreign) harms the cost of equity
while ownership structure (government) has a positive impact on
the cost of equity. Ownership structure has a negative effect on
financial performance because of conflict of interest between
shareholders and management, ownership structure does not
moderate the relationship between eco-innovation and cost of
equity or financial performance because the ownership structure
in this research tends not to change. The implications are
addressed to investors, company, and future researchers. The
implications also need government support in socializing the
importance of eco-innovation so investors are more observant in
investing. The ownership structure consists of managerial,
institutional, family, government, and foreign ownership
structures, which are used as moderating variables and
independent variables. The five types of ownership structures are
examined at once.
Downloads
References
Abu Haija, A. A., & Alrabba, H. M. (2017). Relationship between ownership structure and financial performance. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(3), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i3c2art13
Afkhami Rad, S., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2013). Global Financial Crisis and Role of Ownership Structure on Cost of Capital. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(1), 396–418. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v5i1.3687
Albu, A., & Stelea, S. (2015). Green Business Development using Eco-Innovation. Quality Access to Success, 16(1), 465–472. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282984765_Green_business_development_using_eco-innovation
Angela, J., Jessica, M., Rinaningsih, R., & Haryono, L. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Pemerintah terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara yang Terdaftar di BEI. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 2(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.2.2.203-223
Antarikso, S. (2020). Mengintip Transformasi Unilever (UNVR) Menuju Green Company. Reporter: Ika Puspitasari, Editor: Wahyu T.Rahmawati. https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/mengintip-transformasi-unilever-unvr-menuju-green-company
Apriliani, F., Harto, P., Akuntansi, J., Ekonomika, F., & Diponegoro, U. (2016). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Cost of Capital Dengan Voluntary Disclosure Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 5(4). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/25738
Arifah, D. A., & Liana, V. E. (2018). Good Corporate Governance terhadap Biaya Ekuitas dan Biaya Hutang. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 25(2), 160–172. https://unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe3/article/view/6961
Aymen, B. M. M. (2013). Impact of capital on financial performance of banks: The case of Tunisia. Banks and Bank Systems, 8(4), 47–54. https://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB/Vol 4_2_11.pdf
Bammens, Y., & Hünermund, P. (2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


